Hey @Meaningness, @edelwax told me that you think the Dzogchen idea of 'methods' is equivalent to Joe's idea of values.
Have you written about method before? Where can I learn more about it?
-
-
Not sure I can articulate this well, but the difference has something to do both with potential scale and nebulosity. A tool is necessarily compact and precise. It may share principle and function with a method, but it’s unlikely to change form.
-
A method is adaptable not just in that it can be applied usefully in different circumstances, but in its potential to change appearance. It’s somewhat less pin-down-able than a tool, more Protean in nature.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

And also somehow connected with