Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Meaningness's profile
David Chapman
David Chapman
David Chapman
@Meaningness

Tweets

David Chapman

@Meaningness

Better ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—around problems of meaning and meaninglessness; self and society; ethics, purpose, and value.

meaningness.com/about-my-sites
Joined September 2010

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Tristan Homsi‏ @homsiT 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @reasonisfun

      Have you read Beginning of Infinity yet? 😁

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @homsiT @reasonisfun

      No. About once every three months I re-read the blurb/introduction and re-conclude that I’m not going to get anything out of it. I could be wrong :)

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    3. Tristan Homsi‏ @homsiT 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @reasonisfun

      I ask because, in your terms, I definitely made the trip from stage 4 to 5 practically painlessly and BoI was a big part of that. Also I am very confident you are indeed wrong :)

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @homsiT @reasonisfun

      What I would like to read is a philosophically sophisticated argument for critical rationalism that takes seriously the standard objections to it. I have not found one, and BoI does not appear to be that. If anyone can recommend one, I would be very grateful!

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    5. Tristan Homsi‏ @homsiT 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @reasonisfun

      I think @reasonisfun might be help help you with that And fair enough, I would like to read the standard objections! Do you have a specific piece you'd reference?

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    6. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @homsiT @reasonisfun

      Peter Godfrey-Smith’s _Theory and Reality_ has an introductory overview of criticisms from a philosophical perspective. Just at the level of logic, it doesn’t do the work it would need to do.pic.twitter.com/P07TV8QsCs

      2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
    7. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @homsiT @reasonisfun

      More importantly in my view, it totally fails to explain empirical studies of what successful science does in practice. That empirical work is done in the history and ethnography of science.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @homsiT @reasonisfun

      There are a few pages in BoI that discuss "bad philosophy of science" which show he hasn't read it. There's basically only one specific thing he says, which is that Kuhn was an anti-realist, which is absolutely incorrect.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Tristan Homsi‏ @homsiT 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @reasonisfun

      I don't have an opinion on Kuhn, but I would only hazard you to not miss the forest for the trees, or hold an undue bias against an entire book for one mistake (if it's that) :)

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @homsiT @reasonisfun

      Well, I believe it is a great book in several ways. For instance, it inspires belief in scientific progress, which I think is extremely important, and increasingly under attack.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 15 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @homsiT @reasonisfun

      As a theoretical account of how science works, it appears not to be a serious attempt. He hasn't read the literature and doesn't know what it says and doesn't consider that relevant.

      2:08 PM - 15 Dec 2019
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Jake Orthwein‏ @JakeOrthwein 15 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @Meaningness @homsiT @reasonisfun

          To some extent, I think you pick things up where Deutsch and Popper leave off: with the recognition that science can lack an ultimate foundation, yet still make progress. There are parallels, too, between your account of meta-rationality and Deutsch's CR conception of rationality

          2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. 7 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info