@meaningness Do you have any links that claim to rebut staged/systematic learning models like Dreyfus or shu-ha-ri in favor of Schön-like/metasystematic learning models? I may be talking myself into agreeing to give a "big think" talk.
-
-
Replying to @marick
Sorry to be slow getting back to you on this; I have had to think, and am not coming up with anything. The D&D model is pointing at something real and important, but it’s overly simplistic. I’ve definitely read things saying that, but I can’t remember what/where.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
Thanks. No need to apologize for slowness: I still operate on email timescales. It's interesting that your observation that "one still operates in all these modes at times" seems universally under-rug-swept by the level-definers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marick @Meaningness
Maybe a thing to concentrate on is that "levelers" implicitly claim that "oh, that small bit of bouncing among levels is not important".But what if it's way more important than what level you're at? (See also your comment about D's distinction between conscious and unconscious.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marick @Meaningness
And see also
@DeconstructingU's removing of the oblivion(?) level from his model in his latest podcast, where he (virtuously) converted a level into a characteristic spread among levels.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Nice analogy!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.