Could we please earmark 1% of this $100bn for adversarial research to do the control experiments that would (with high probability) show ML barely works, and when it does it’s for easily understood, boring reasons?https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/1195359574762483713 …
-
-
Thanks for clarifying this (and thanks to Miller for raising that point). I had interpreted "adversarial" in the way Miller was thinking, since that's exactly the term used for some ML methods
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.