Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce Meaningness
David Chapman
David Chapman
David Chapman
@Meaningness

Tweets

David Chapman

@Meaningness

Better ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—around problems of meaning and meaninglessness; self and society; ethics, purpose, and value.

meaningness.com/about-my-sites
Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2010.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
    • Prijavi Tweet

    🧵 100 years ago today, the New York Times announced the death of rationalism.pic.twitter.com/0z9rqicWfB

    08:57 - 10. stu 2019.
    • 38 proslijeđenih tweetova
    • 133 oznake „sviđa mi se”
    • random chicken Jonathan Mannhart 🔮 PascalBellanca-Penel Dr. Drew Brayshaw Neovictorian Delysis Nicholas Malaya Sobu
    5 replies 38 proslijeđenih tweetova 133 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      1. Novi razgovor
      2. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        The NYT reported Eddington’s announcement that a measurement of the deflection of starlight by the gravitational field of the sun had confirmed Einstein’s theory of general relativity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddington_experiment …pic.twitter.com/v2aDN8Myl3

        1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      3. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Retroactively, after decades of difficult work by top philosophers, we understand this test of relativity as a triumph of the scientific worldview. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity …pic.twitter.com/nazVLAd7F3

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      4. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        For decades, general relativity was popularly felt as a disastrous disconfirmation of the scientific worldview. Rationalism collapsed as a source of certainty, and never fully recovered. One could date the first crack of postmodernity to 100 years ago today.pic.twitter.com/ZoJFigDCCz

        9 proslijeđenih tweetova 36 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      5. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        It is now difficult to comprehend how completely and shockingly relativity shattered rationalism. For millennia, Euclid’s _Elements_ was *the* eternal source of absolute, unquestionable Truth about the fundamental nature of reality. Relativity showed it was just false.pic.twitter.com/x7N0RpeXS3

        5 proslijeđenih tweetova 34 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      6. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Cultural historians take Newtonian physics as the foundation of the European Enlightenment. It provided a complete understanding of the material world, with perfect certainty. Modernity consists of extending that paradigm to all realms of meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment …pic.twitter.com/QYkw7dV9Hf

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      7. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        In the 1920s, intellectuals of all stripes tried to assimilate the disproof of Newton into some new version of modernity that would take relativity into account. This was entirely unsuccessful.pic.twitter.com/3cvH7nVCyI

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      8. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Meanwhile, popular faith in rationality, in modernity, in the world making sense, had already been profoundly shaken by the Great War, just ended. “Lights all askew in the heavens” was understood as more of the same: confirmation of cosmic senselessness. https://meaningness.com/systems-crisis-breakdown …pic.twitter.com/RSFHNMSceK

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      9. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        The 1919 announcement that SCIENTISTS PROVE WORLD MAKES NO SENSE was a Big Deal in a way we have forgotten. It was misappropriated as a totem of nebulosity in general. Anti-rationalists seized it as justification for the general relativity of all truth. https://www.britannica.com/science/relativity/Experimental-evidence-for-general-relativity …pic.twitter.com/N2r784Vi43

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 18 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      10. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        It is hard now to understand relativity as disproof of scientific rationality because the current scientistic-rationalist worldview is profoundly different in form, as well as content, from that of the early 20th century. Logical positivism to the rescue! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_positivism …pic.twitter.com/IIzJXqTqmG

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      11. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Logical positivism attempted to rescue scientistic rationalism from two deep wounds: general relativity and the crisis of the foundations of mathematics. It succeeded in rethinking science in a way that made relativity acceptable. Unfortunately, that was overshadowed by events…

        3 proslijeđena tweeta 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      12. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Hardly anyone understood relativity; no one understood quantum. It said everything is inherently random, and statements could be true and false at the same time (Schrödinger’s cat). Again this was culturally appropriated as a general-purpose justification for irrational woo.pic.twitter.com/G6jdhFKzU4

        2 proslijeđena tweeta 24 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      13. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        When quantum arrived, the logical positivists strove valiantly to incorporate it into their new rationalism. They didn’t get far, and the attempt was overwhelmed as new blows to rationalism kept coming. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem was the next most influential culturally.

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      14. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Logical positivism finally disintegrated altogether in the 1960s. It failed not for one reason, but for dozens, each individually fatal. I know of no discussion enumerating them all. _The Eggplant_ covers more of them than any source I’ve found.https://meaningness.com/eggplant 

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      15. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Logical positivism was the last serious attempt to rescue rationalism. All subsequent rationalisms have been unserious, in the sense that they don’t even try to address the well-known problems that wrecked the logical positivist program.

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      16. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        No coincidence the postmodern era began shortly after logical positivism collapsed. Rationalism was the foundational ideology of modernity. Without that, the essential chain of justification broke, and the ship of modernity was wrecked on the stormy seas of meaning.pic.twitter.com/F0m2yM2M9u

        4 proslijeđena tweeta 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      17. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Science still works, some of the time, of course. Rationality is still better than irrationality. Why? Stubborn clinging to the wreck of rationalism renders asking that question impossible—much less answering it.

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      18. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        David Chapman je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceDavid Chapman

        We’re still floundering in the storm of postmodern irrationalism, announced by the NYT 100 years ago today. We can do better. We can rebuild the flotsam of a broken modernity into new, sea-worthy watercraft.https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1193573460103946240 …

        David Chapman je dodan/na,

        David Chapman @Meaningness
        🧵 100 years ago today, the New York Times announced the death of rationalism. pic.twitter.com/0z9rqicWfB
        Prikaži ovu nit
        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      19. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Follow-up to this thread. Several replies objected that relativity couldn’t have been a shock, because science consists of replacing incomplete approximate theories with successively better ones. >

        0 proslijeđenih tweetova 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      20. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 10. stu 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        This is not at all how science was understood in 1900. Science in those days found absolute, eternal, exact Truths. The “successively better theories” story, taught in high school now, was invented in the 20th century precisely to account for relativity and quantum.

        10 replies 4 proslijeđena tweeta 44 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      21. Kraj razgovora

    Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

    Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

      Sponzorirani tweet

      false

      • © 2020 Twitter
      • O Twitteru
      • Centar za pomoć
      • Uvjeti
      • Pravila o privatnosti
      • Imprint
      • Kolačići
      • Informacije o oglasima