Sorry I'm out of the loop here; which article was this? I might be able to say something, I don't know... btw I STILL haven't had a chance to listen to your podcast with @ssica3003, but @_awbery_ spoke very highly of it, and I look forward to it!
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @LC_Ceriello and
Well we could do a compare on the article I mentioned (linked here) but my thought was that meta-rationality would likely fall under the metamodern label that
@GregDember &@LC_Ceriello outline, so even your .02 on Vajra. correlations would be interesting.https://medium.com/what-is-metamodern/after-postmodernism-eleven-metamodern-methods-in-the-arts-767f7b646cae …2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JaredJanes @Meaningness and
I don't know a lot about meta-rationality. I'm interested in how it may be a phenomenon of metamodernism. I realize it's probably hard to capture in a tweet, but could you give the nutshell of how you see the connection?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GregDember @JaredJanes and
I take metamodernism to be the cultural aspect of meta-systematicity, and meta-rationality to be the cognitive aspect. This usage may not be standard, but we are inventing this stuff as we go along! https://meaningness.com/eggplant/terms pic.twitter.com/8SP9eFlXiG
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @GregDember and
I guess I would say, invent away! But can someone explain one thing: Why call these things "metamodern" when y'all already have perfectly good terms for the things you're describing--terms that are not already in use and doing work in critical/cultural theory capacities?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LC_Ceriello @GregDember and
I sympathize—It’s worrying and frustrating when a term one invents gets appropriated and used for somewhat different things by some larger group that you don’t have sway over and who may not understand the original meaning.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @LC_Ceriello and
I find great personal, systemic & cultural value/overlap from all these lenses. My intention here is to get our disparate 'meta' camps to engage more with each other in the name of generative exploration. Throwing some more nebulosity into mix I suppose.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @JaredJanes @LC_Ceriello and
There does seem to me to be significant resonances and overlaps and that mutual awareness should be helpful!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @JaredJanes and
Re “why bring in dev psych”: because of the explicit and apparently valuable correspondence between the stages of personal development and the historical development from tradition to modernity to postmodernity to metamodernity.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @JaredJanes and
Whenever people compare stages of personal development with stages of cultural development, my inner skeptic stands up. Look at Zhuangzi for a great example of a postmodern thinker thousands of years before his 'time'.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
David Chapman Retweeted David Chapman
David Chapman added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.