Not sure what you mean, both? Not sure why so expensive, limited release I guess. I'd check out the website, which has a lot of the same content
-
-
Replying to @cognazor @JaredJanes and
http://metamoderna.org is helpful. Ty. The only issue I have w/it is its claim that MM only enters the scene with the advent of the internet. This overlooks thinkers like William James and Paul Feyerabend (et al) who show strong MM tendencies, at least by this sites parameters.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dfarrrr @JaredJanes and
Perhaps the point is that, while there were thinkers here and there that had metamodern (or proto-metamodern) tendencies in the past, it couldn't emerge as a socio/cultural/political movement until the internet.
7 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
I think this type of development goes back quite far, but was quite rare. I think Vajrayana Buddhism is built on refined metamodern philosophy & practice.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @JaredJanes @cognazor and
Not sure if I get the drift— what aspects of mm do you connect w Vajrayana and what about the fact that mm emerges as a response to mod & Pomo— how are you saying Vajr could be “built on” mm?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LC_Ceriello @cognazor and
Well... this does make more sense from a developmental MM POV (ie. personal/cultural dev being similar), but cultural epistemes aside if I look at the MM methods listed in the article we covered in our ep I see many of the techniques in Vajrayana.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @JaredJanes @LC_Ceriello and
If we're lucky maybe we could get
@Meaningness &/or@_awbery_ to chime in on any connections they see with metamodern/meta-rational sensibilities found in Vajrayana practices & philosophy...2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @JaredJanes @LC_Ceriello and
Vajrayana’s mostly still presented with pre-modern framework and sensibility. (I think that can work for some, but has predictable limitations and failure modes.) Some of late Vajrayana is explicitly meta systematic, in principle that might be a good base for a mm presentation.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @_awbery_ @JaredJanes and
I’d concur that something can’t be metamodern without specifically situating itself relative to modernity and postmodernity, and there is no extant full presentation of Vajrayana that does that. Our own highly-incomplete presentations do, but they’re mostly IOUs
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @_awbery_ and
I’d also concur that the explicit meta-systematicity of some Vajrayana gives it a “proto-metamodern” flavor
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
This, from @GregDember’s essay, is certainly resonant with Vajrayana, which began as a reaction against Sutrayana’s rejection of emotions, detachment from sensory experience, and analytical-intellectual reductionism, in favor of direct participation in the world.pic.twitter.com/4Loi7tsT99
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @_awbery_ and
Joining late. Do you have a link to
@GregDember's essay?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marick @Meaningness and
I can provide that!https://medium.com/what-is-metamodern/after-postmodernism-eleven-metamodern-methods-in-the-arts-767f7b646cae …
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @_awbery_ and
I guess it is "resonant with" --I will go that far! ;-)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.