Not sure what you mean, both? Not sure why so expensive, limited release I guess. I'd check out the website, which has a lot of the same content
-
-
Thanks, David. Are you familiar with the body of work in academic humanities and cultural criticism emanating from the 2010 "Notes on Metamodernism" by Vermeulen & van den Akker, who I'm pretty sure got the term out there before integral/meta-rationality/etc folks began using it?
-
Yes; probably not all of it, but I think I read everything that google was able to find as of two years ago
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I guess I would say, invent away! But can someone explain one thing: Why call these things "metamodern" when y'all already have perfectly good terms for the things you're describing--terms that are not already in use and doing work in critical/cultural theory capacities?
-
I sympathize—It’s worrying and frustrating when a term one invents gets appropriated and used for somewhat different things by some larger group that you don’t have sway over and who may not understand the original meaning.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'd say that - pivoting off of Integral Theory - that any true post-post-modern system would have to have cultural aspects, systematicity, and cognitive aspects. Roughly 2nd person, 3rd person, and 1st person. Probably the different PPM systems do some aspects better than others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.