If you say “it’s not like that, I can only give heuristics and analogies and pointers and landmarks,” they think you don’t know what you are talking about. (In which case, stick to technical rationality and to modernist Theravada as long as you can; it will be more comfortable.)
-
-
Show this thread
-
Monists want to hear “get in touch with your intuitions, man, rationality is so square, you gotta realize we’re All One” which is false, useless, and harmful.
Show this thread -
In Dzogchen meditation and in meta-rationality, there’s accurate and helpful guidelines, but it’s up to you to figure out how and when and whether and why to apply them. Those are the patterns, like a herringbone sky.
Show this thread -
If you want affirmation that Everything Is Cosmically Perfect, check out pop Neo-Advaita, and stick with it until the idiocy makes you gag and you vomit the whole universe back up.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You may have just described wonton soup. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundun
-
Thanks, this is very cool!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
nebulous but patterned is a good encapsulation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So you're saying to understand meta-rationality one has to think meta-rational?
-
I guess we're lucky that rationality is nebulous enough to contain enough meta-rationality from which to bootstrap.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or... just stop thinking about it so much. Which... is kinda the point...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.