It’s excellent, although a bit frustrating for my purposes, because it has only a couple pages on meta-rat. Like almost all stage theorists, the treatment is very abstract, and the sense is that this is something too advanced for the audience of the book. (Kegan does this too.)
-
-
-
It’s really strange that many outstanding thinkers understand meta-rat and recognize its importance, but almost no one has written a book-length treatment. The few who have are crankish and not credible.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, he’s good! Exception to what I said above, thanks!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, I haven’t got anything new to say; I’m just trying to make decades-old stuff accessible.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Thanks!
End of conversation
-
-
-
I mentioned it at some point - the book didn't make much impression on me, but he had such a similar topic (and name!) to Kegan that I thought I should pass it on. Maybe I would like it more now.
-
Thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.