'The Mythical Number Two' - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323998611_The_Mythical_Number_Two … - via @xuenay
Wish I'd found this paper before writing my bat and ball post! Splits out distinctions that have been lumped under 'System 1'/'System 2' (or more recently 'Type 1'/'Type 2')
-
-
Sounds like people did call bs, including one of the authors of that paper (must be sick of it now if he started in 1989...) But not enough people, by the sound of it.pic.twitter.com/8xQxflsaDi
-
I happened to see the other day that TF&S has been on NYT bestseller list for >200 weeks straight
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The people working on more nuanced versions of S1/S2 theory did criticize the more simplistic versions (see the Evans & Stanovich paper in my post), but sensible researchers calling BS on some versions of a theory may just get ignored by people pushing the worse versions.
-
Yeah should maybe have just included the whole of that box, here's the rest (with the Evans and Stanovich bit):pic.twitter.com/rrohDrwdMJ
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.