The @meaningness model of how meaning fell apart (choiceless --> systematic --> countercultural --> subcultural --> atomized) and how it can be reconstructed (fluidity) rhymes well with my monotemporality --> atemporality --> multitemporality modelhttps://meaningness.com/meaningness-history …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @vgr @Meaningness
I thought that Jordan Peterson had a well thought out approach to personal meaning and cultural meaning, but I'm not smart enough to figure out where he would fit into this model, do you guys have any insight?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Yes very much so. By emphasizing the virtues of the choiceless and systematic modes, which are in danger of being catastrophically lost. Those must be restored in the fluid mode.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I’m not sure he appreciates the virtues of the countercultural, subcultural, and atomized modes, which also must be conserved and built upon. (See! I’m a convervative :)
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @vgr
From here also https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/philosophy/postmodernism-definition-and-critique-with-a-few-comments-on-its-relationship-with-marxism/ …pic.twitter.com/FGYJe7CEFk
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
is this comparable with your view on complete stances requiring nebulousity and pattern of meaningpic.twitter.com/Tji2eTZgfj
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes; postmodernity is nihilistic (a denial of pattern). Modernity is eternalistic (a denial of nebulosity). The fluid mode should acknowledge both
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.