@Meaningness Does a Stage 5 metasystematic thinker think that there are a finite or infinite number of systems to negotiate between?
Not a question I’ve seen come up... what do you think? (And what difference would it make?)
-
-
I think that I can, in part, move through named systems and, in another part, move through unnamed systems. And I can sense, also, that there are more systems than I know. So the difference I might consider comes in terms of capacity building: In the quest to become a better
-
thinker, should I learn more and different systems more fluidly? Or should I accept that the set of systems is unsystematizable and focus on fluidity of negotiation? I think I just answered my own question...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.