Farmers have been paying to sequester carbon in soil for years. AMP grazing does it faster and better than any other strategy, including so-called high tech solutions.
-
-
-
What does AMP stand for?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's some expensive virtue signalling.
#VeblenGoodsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope, maybe the first for a tech company. But oil companies had been doing this for about 2 decades.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patrickc Great start. Putting bubbles of CO2 in the earth seems like sidetracking, though. It will out, back to square one.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
fantastic effort! Also, companies like Audi are working with carbon removal startups like Climeworks to produce zero-carbon e-diesel, and global resources companies like BHP Billiton, Chevron and Occidental Petroleum are investing millions in direct air capture tech
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Removing CO2 other than with fauna is: - expensive ($ 600 per tCO2 for Climeworks) - needs a lot of additional energy - has to be stored somewhere The emphasis should be on not emitting CO2, this is way cheaper and has a lot of additional benefits. cc
@patrickcThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope this isn’t like plastic recycling - where the companies doing the work *say* they’re recycling it but actually just dumping it to slowly rot
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course the real thing would be to reforest Sahara
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.