@fourbeerspod Two psychologists, one having published several studies on meditation, discuss the state of research.
Spoiler: thousands of studies and decades of work have found pretty much nothing, partly but not only for #replicationcrisis reasons.https://fourbeers.fireside.fm/27
-
-
What I know about neuroscience, I mostly learned around 1990. I had a pretty good idea of what was known and knowable. The main new thing since then was fMRI, which I had good reasons to think is mostly not a thing. So why was I (mostly) taken in by the hype?
Show this thread -
Around this time, I discussed the meditation research with my sister, who was the Chair of the neuroscience program at UC Davis. She was characteristically taciturn, but reading between the lines slightly her reaction was “almost certainly mostly nonsense.” Why didn’t I listen?
Show this thread -
Clearly, in part, I *wanted to believe*, for essentially religious reasons. That’s really embarrassing. https://vividness.live/2011/04/25/translating-the-meditation-research/ …pic.twitter.com/qsX9NniM4b
Show this thread -
The other thing is that neuropsychological self-confidence and hype peaked roughly around 2012. Having not paid attention to the field for 20 years, I misread “tens of thousands of scientists think they are making amazing progress” for “presumably, there’s something there.”
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah we might like to believe that overall large scale or persistent changes to your mental state are observable. But really, we still can't be sure.
-
Drat, I see I got the wrong URL in there. I still think this is either very funny or very clever. Probably not both.https://buddhism-for-vampires.com/philosophical-zombies-fMRI …
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.