Many disdainful comments re @patrickc/@tylercowen: “Arrogant tech bros ignorant of the existing fields of history & sociology of science & technology, gah”
I’d like to point out some broad patterns of academic dysfunction manifesting here (
)
I don’t know the primary literature well, although I’ve read some of it. Generally I like it, but my impression is that later developments pretty much overtook the whole thing. IOW I don’t know of something they did that wasn’t done more thoroughly later. Did I miss something?
-
-
My knowledge of it is as 'cursory as yours here, actually. From what I've seen -- only the early stuff has resonated and it's what *I* associate "the category" with [many others may not]. Thanks.
-
Re: > IOW I don’t know of something they did that wasn’t done more thoroughly later. Did I miss something? What was a more thorough job? Ethnomethodology, I'm going with in the first instance?
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.