In some ways, I think yes. Especially the JP wing.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @cognazor
his thinking on academic subjects is meta-modern. his thinking on politics is basic bitch conservative Boomerism. I don't think there are any meta-modern political thinkers on the right in the IDW.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @cognazor
What's the criteria for being meta-modern? I still can't figure this out.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AE_Robbert @cognazor
sounds about right
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
in seriousness: one of the qualities of anything I would label "meta-modern" is that it has fuzzy boundaries and doesn't fit easily into established categories, so the confusion is expected and in fact desirable to a certain degree.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
@meaningness uses the term "Nebulosity" (lit. cloudiness) to point to this quality of having fractal geometry around the edges, and no solid core whatever. I think it's an apt visual metaphor.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, okay. Does
@Meaningness use the term metamodernism?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
he calls his own project (the http://meanigness.com e-book) "meta-rationalism" which I would say is a specific variety of meta-modernism focused on philosophy, religion, language, and Anglophone culture in the 21st century.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Thanks. I’ll check this out.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
This might be a good starting point:https://meaningness.com/metablog/stem-fluidity-bridge …
-
-
Great. I’ll give it a read. Thanks!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.