I'd be curious to hear your thoughts about why Dzogchen, and in particular the state of mind it tends toward, is different. Could you speak to this?
This is difficult because I'm really not qualified to say anything about Dzogchen. Also any discussion of Dzogchen has to be highly personalized and I don't know you at all. Please discount accordingly. I'll try anyway >
-
-
"Meaning-making" sounds distressingly existentialist to me. Meaning lives in interaction. It's not an individual production. We can individually contribute to it a bit, but quantitatively we mainly experience it in flow, not make it deliberately.https://meaningness.com/metablog/meaningness-mountains …
-
Dzogchen leaves meaningness as-it-is, which tends to allow it to clarify. This passage (and what precedes and follows it) in one of the Jung-influenced essays tries to get at that: https://buddhism-for-vampires.com/hunting-the-shadow …pic.twitter.com/EucCBVSzz3
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
in 100 years; Dzogchen will probably be extinct.