@evantthompson has written a very helpful comment on my 1st post on Pragmatic Dharma. https://parletre.wordpress.com/2011/06/07/test-post/#comment-21 …
@non_buddhism @Sciamanoinglese @Imperfectbuddha @OortCloudAtlas @ordinarymind1 @redpillchange @ronpurser @alohadharma @Failed_Buddhist @Meaningness @danielmingram
Again my knowledge of vipassana is confined to reading so I don't want to make any strong claims. And psychodynamics isn't one of my main frames of reference (although I did do graduate course work in the field at Harvard a million years ago...). But >
-
-
I did write a series of half a dozen essays exploring Vajrayana from a Jungian perspective starting here:https://buddhism-for-vampires.com/we-are-all-monsters …
-
One point I make in the series is that "states of mind" is an individualist touchstone the interactivist framework rejects. I try to present Vajrayana in interactional/embodied/situated terms. (This may not be fully true to the tradition, but isn't a complete fabrication either.)
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
in 100 years; Dzogchen will probably be extinct.