@evantthompson has written a very helpful comment on my 1st post on Pragmatic Dharma. https://parletre.wordpress.com/2011/06/07/test-post/#comment-21 …
@non_buddhism @Sciamanoinglese @Imperfectbuddha @OortCloudAtlas @ordinarymind1 @redpillchange @ronpurser @alohadharma @Failed_Buddhist @Meaningness @danielmingram
-
-
But how do you see the resultant state(s) of mind tending to function, psychodynamically, in contrast to those evoked by vipassana?
-
Again my knowledge of vipassana is confined to reading so I don't want to make any strong claims. And psychodynamics isn't one of my main frames of reference (although I did do graduate course work in the field at Harvard a million years ago...). But >
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
"Dzogchen" covers a multitude of evils and any contemporary use of it requires extensive reworking. Also it was always a hyper-advanced practice and on the whole I think trying to explain it popularly now is pointless... so I've mostly written about tantra instead.
-
Tantra would also require drastic reworking to make it useful now, but it's more understandable than Dzogchen, and we do have examples of successful popular deployments.https://vividness.live/2019/04/24/reinventing-buddhist-tantra-annotated-table-of-contents/ …
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
in 100 years; Dzogchen will probably be extinct.