@evantthompson has written a very helpful comment on my 1st post on Pragmatic Dharma. https://parletre.wordpress.com/2011/06/07/test-post/#comment-21 …
@non_buddhism @Sciamanoinglese @Imperfectbuddha @OortCloudAtlas @ordinarymind1 @redpillchange @ronpurser @alohadharma @Failed_Buddhist @Meaningness @danielmingram
-
-
Vajrayana in general, and Dzogchen in particular, have goals that are more compatible with what people want now than Sutrayana does. They are at least pointing in an attractive direction, and 20th C modernist Theravada isn't afaics.https://vividness.live/2013/10/24/sutra-tantra-and-the-modern-worldview/ …
-
But how do you see the resultant state(s) of mind tending to function, psychodynamically, in contrast to those evoked by vipassana?
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
OK this is interesting to me, from a speculative history stance (and a few others.) What do you see as the flaws within Dozgchen that are potentially fatal? Why won’t it be practiced in 100 years? (I agree that Mahasi-esque noting practices will likely last a long time)
-
> the flaws within Dozgchen Product-market fit based on segmentation dynamics that no longer obtain; providers unable to pivot positioning strategy.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
in 100 years; Dzogchen will probably be extinct.