Pro tip: make breakfast reasonably, not rationally.pic.twitter.com/K5FOEItgj9
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
That explanation of the formal rationality of sheep-counting refers to this parable:https://meaningness.com/eggplant/pebbles …
I get the dichotomy of course but "reasonable" is a bad name for the left-hand column ("rational" is bad too but stuck with that I guess). "Practical" maybe? Or situated, concrete, local, embodied, informal, improvised, indigenous, contextual...
I am definitely open to changing. But specifically what is bad about “reasonable”? (Each of the others has problems too...)
What is a "concrete epistemology?" I'm not sure I understand that one.
(Fantastic table, btw. Will study it until I have arrived at perfectly articulated definitions of "reasonable" and "rational"
)
It’s the knowledge that’s concrete, rather than the epistemology.
I think you’d really enjoy Gendlin’s philosophy of the implicit. Starts where G. Ryle, M. Polanyi, Wittgenstein, etc left off. https://focusing.org/gendlin4
Also Gendlin’s Thinking at the Edge process seems right up your ally. https://focusing.org/tae
I think you'll find a remarkable similarity between left and right brain types of processing, as explained by Dr. Iain McGilchrist. His Youtube talks contextualized much of Buddhist practice for me.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.