What was your biggest single clue that you either do or don’t live in the base reality?
-
-
I'm guessing repeated almost-truth is due to methodological artifact/regularities? The way we theorize and solve problems generates successive almost-truths as work product. So in some sense it's a property of reality. In another sense it's a property of us-in-reality. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
Problem solving: Trying a messy thing, paring away dimensionality until it's clear that what's left is wrong, adding dimensions back until it's clear that *that's* wrong, miracle step to a hopefully slightly closer messy thing, repeat.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well, I'm not a serious proponent of simtheory (general-purpose ST is too unfalsifiable for my taste) but I do find funny that certain features of the observed universe are very hacky
-
Like, relativity/quantum mechanics "reconciliation problems" is obviously a result of two distinct "simulation areas" being operated on by different engines (by different hardware maybe!) and somewhat crudely stapled together. Like "dedicated" physics engines in computer games

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.