So how do scientists gain knowledge, if not by using the scientific method?pic.twitter.com/KaSVdLklhh
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
(“Maybe I’m wrong” is Bayesianism, more-or-less. Valuable but doesn’t take you very far.)
Does Bayesianism get you all the way from Newton+Maxwell to Planck to Bohr to Schrodinger? Maybe in some super general sense, but seems to me there’s something more. A willingness to admit error beyond Bayes? 1/
Bayes seems like it gets you to change the coefficients of your epicycles. Kinda like Bayes gives you a continuous tweaking of weights, but few people are willing to utterly expand the set of entities the weights applies to? 2/
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.