Hi #EMCA friends - #canIhazpdf (h/t to @Meaningness for the question) of Garfinkel's unpublished papers 'Respecifying the Natural Sciences I & II' ?
-
-
Replying to @saul @Meaningness
or: "RESPECIFYING THE NATURAL SCIENCES AS DISCOVERING SCIENCES OF PRACTICAL ACTION: (I & II) DOING SO ETHNOGRAPHICALLY BY ADMINISTERING A SCHEDULE OF CONTINGENCIES IN DISCUSSIONS WITH LABORATORY SCIENTISTS AND BY HANGING AROUND THEIR LABORATORIES"?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @saul @Meaningness
.
@w0rdmerchant@saul please check your inbox.@Meaningness, sorry i don't have your email address.3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Wow, thank you so much!! Saul has passed it on to me. This is something of a holy grail—all the citation chains in science EM track back to it. I find it often valuable to locate the earliest statement of an idea in order to best understand its subsequent elaborations.pic.twitter.com/zmKuWFAAXD
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @dirkvl and
OMG, my erstwhile collaborator Phil Agre appears on page 5! I had no idea…pic.twitter.com/ldFSjTSU5a
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
There’s a tape recording of their conversation in the Garfinkel archive in Massachusetts. I saw it while there but was looking for 500 other things :)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Whoa!! That would be interesting. Phil gave me an account after the fact of course
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @saul and
My main takeaway was “that’s one weird dude” :)
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.