A
reflecting on @KevinSimler’s interactive essay. It’s fun and easy—read it first!
His post has a sudden plot twist toward the end, and takes on a darker tone.
[SPOILERS of sorts coming]https://twitter.com/KevinSimler/status/1128079359267430400 …
-
Show this thread -
Kevin’s post interactively illustrates and applies percolation theory. I’m envious and admiring; I’ve been looking for an application of percolation theory for 30 years. He found one right where I’m working now, in understanding scientific progress! https://meaningness.com/metablog/how-to-think …pic.twitter.com/R9WH16yfcU
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
The last in Kevin’s series of interactive illustrations shows the effect adding a fraction of “careerists” to scientific knowledge networks. Once you get to a critical percent, they shut down progress. The model isn’t quantitative, but usefully conveys the intuition.pic.twitter.com/WWTtIcZCro
1 reply 4 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
Careerism is a natural consequence of the incentives created by what Richard Feynman called “cargo cult science.” https://meaningness.com/metablog/upgrade-your-cargo-cult …pic.twitter.com/3KdDtC2pk7
1 reply 6 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
“Careerism” has the implicit implication that science is a GOOD career, and people do it for that reason. Unfortunately, it’s a terrible career, and one reason we have so much bad science is that many of the people who could best do it choose not to, because they figure that out
2 replies 3 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
Conversely, most people currently working in science shouldn’t be. They either can’t do it, or don’t really care to. (Maybe they could or would given better incentives.) As Kevin observes, going-through-the-motions science has crowded out the real thing. https://meaningness.com/metablog/upgrade-your-cargo-cult …pic.twitter.com/mQ5P1cSFQB
1 reply 2 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
Making science a not-terrible career has to be part of fixing incentives. But then more people will be attracted who want good careers. So there has to be a filter. Which is what brought us to the current impasse:
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Most of what scientists do is artificial activities required to get yourself through endless steps of career filtering, put in place with good intentions to ensure that only good science is funded, but which instead almost completely replaced actual science.
3 replies 8 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
This is so bad that some institutions have started choosing who to fund literally at random. At least that wastes much less time, so if someone competent randomly gets funded, they can do science instead of writing grant applications. (h/t
@michael_nielsen)1 reply 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread -
Also, funding by peer review results in group-think and whole scientific fields floating off in a self-perpetuating irreality bubble for decades. Randomness will fund mavericks, mostly crackpots, but some may blow up established dysfunctional disciplines.
1 reply 5 retweets 16 likesShow this thread
We can do better than random, I hope! We know something about what creates innovative “scenes.” And we know something about how institutions can reflect on, and upgrade, their operating principles. https://meaningness.com/metablog/upgrade-your-cargo-cult …pic.twitter.com/5V5YQBvu9G
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Combining a basic filter for competence and randomness seems promising? It seems better than competing based on small differences that may just be marketing.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @dougvk
Hi, you can read this thread from
@Meaningness here:https://threader.app/thread/1128389263526060032 …0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
interactive essay!
How to prevent disease, control nuclear reactions, and encourage the spread of ideas. All with playable simulations.