Re-reading Garfinkel’s 1967 _Studies in Ethnomethodology_ and finding it hugely easier than on my first time through in 1987. I’ve learned and changed since then, but also— so have the times. What was almost incomprehensibly alien then is directly relevant to our now.
-
-
EM is more obviously relevant to UX, and of course there’s a tradition of application there. UX doesn’t get the respect it deserves… I suppose funding is scarce even for UX research, never mind EM-for-UX research?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's when it's in computer vision, there are plenty of chatbots, linear regression, boring expert systems, and other nonsense being rebranded as AI.
-
Yes, that’s true. It’s rational to try to grab some of the funding pie while it lasts! It’s the image stuff that is driving the hype I think though. Reasonably enough; that’s the main place there are startling new results.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.