Re-reading Garfinkel’s 1967 _Studies in Ethnomethodology_ and finding it hugely easier than on my first time through in 1987. I’ve learned and changed since then, but also— so have the times. What was almost incomprehensibly alien then is directly relevant to our now.
-
-
Although the “we have to rethink our methodology first” diagnosis seems importantly right in some ways, it seems to me as an outsider even more important to broaden and deepen dialog with other fields, to take “hybrid studies” more seriously.
-
Of course that’s pragmatic in part: demonstrating actual value is a way of gaining support from other fields for the work. As Anderson & Sharrock somewhat reluctantly acknowledge.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.