Re-reading Garfinkel’s 1967 _Studies in Ethnomethodology_ and finding it hugely easier than on my first time through in 1987. I’ve learned and changed since then, but also— so have the times. What was almost incomprehensibly alien then is directly relevant to our now.
-
-
This missive by Anderson & Sharrock also talks about the need to defibrillate EM, but IMO the root problem is more widespread than it having "run its course" (c.f. incentive structures & legacy cruft in science more generally) http://www.sharrockandanderson.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Run-its-Course-VII.pdf …
-
I’ve just read this, thanks! I’ve read several seemingly fairly-similar pieces by Mike Lynch, but the differences were illuminating. The bit on “how can we achieve additionality” is inspiring (and I suspect Lynch would have some objections here).
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You've reminded me of one such example I heard that was introduced in this podcast.https://tlv1.fm/the-tel-aviv-review/2018/08/27/take-notice-the-power-of-the-unremarkable/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.