So here he’s saying “yeah LP was wrong because [among other things] actual certainty is impossible, but Latour’s pointing this out is hardly interesting.” The EM approach also rejects all flavors of rationalism, presumably including e.g. Bayesianism/probabilism.
Citation here, I can’t find the original journal page off hand: http://emcawiki.net/bibtex/browser.php?key=Garfinkel1981&bib=emca.bib …
-
-
A live-tweeted co-reading of the paper with
@drossbucket, who did her PhD on neutron stars, ended here. It may help clarify the jargon & concepts. Our conversation branched some & twitter doesn’t do tree threading, but this is probably the longest branch:https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/914591862509379585 … -
Reading the thread, but thought you might like this Twitter tree viewing thing:https://twitter.com/reasonisfun/status/1123292851339780096 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.