Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Meaningness's profile
David Chapman
David Chapman
David Chapman
@Meaningness

Tweets

David Chapman

@Meaningness

Better ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—around problems of meaning and meaninglessness; self and society; ethics, purpose, and value.

meaningness.com/about-my-sites
Joined September 2010

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Dispelling counterproductive quasi-religious rationalist myths about science does not in any way imply that science itself does not work, is not rational, objective, etc. Michael Lynch, _Scientific practice and ordinary action_, 1993, p. 317pic.twitter.com/hQqk2pe8A8

      3 replies 7 retweets 22 likes
    2. mrgunn‏ @mrgunn 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness

      That's fair, but sounds a little bit like a strawman to me, because I thought the belief that science produces absolute certainty to be rare, at least among scientists. Also, for what scientific endeavor is social constructivism useful?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @mrgunn

      Lynch’s book lays out the ethnomethodological approach to understanding science, which rejects the “social constructionist” view of e.g. Latour. He argues that Latour just did sign flips in logical positivism while retaining the conceptual framework, which was wrong.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    4. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @mrgunn

      So here he’s saying “yeah LP was wrong because [among other things] actual certainty is impossible, but Latour’s pointing this out is hardly interesting.” The EM approach also rejects all flavors of rationalism, presumably including e.g. Bayesianism/probabilism.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    5. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @mrgunn

      Lynch and others suggested that (unlike “social constructivism”) EM could help scientists do science, and I think they were right. Unfortunately the field imploded for political reasons just as he wrote that book (1993), so this remains an unfulfilled promise.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    6. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @mrgunn

      Although I don’t claim to be doing EM, my “meta-rationality” work draws heavily on it, and its whole purpose is to be useful in practice for working scientists and engineers (NOT to be philosophy or any other academic theoretical thing). Whether I succeed remains to be seen!

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    7. mrgunn‏ @mrgunn 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness

      EM = ethnomethodology? Thanks for clarifying the distinction between Lynch & Latour. I'll check out Lynch's book. Given the clarity of your other writing, I'm sure you'll succeed, if you can finish.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @mrgunn

      Yes, EM = ethnomethodology I wouldn't actually recommend the book. It's extremely tedious but it was important for me to make sure I understood the framework. If you are interested I can try and point you at some worked-out examples instead!

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. mrgunn‏ @mrgunn 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness

      Examples would be great! I'm very curious about how it could reject probability & Bayesianism but still have use for science.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @mrgunn

      Distinction between technical rationality = ways of applying formal methods in concrete real-world situations & rationalism = metaphysical claims that some sort of rationality guarantees correctness, optimality, or some other epistemic wonderfulness

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 1 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @mrgunn

      Rationality, including probabilistic techniques, is obviously frequently extremely valuable in practice. Rationalism is wrong; no strong specific claims about rationality-in-practice are justifiable or correct. Also sometimes harmful in leading people to use rationality badly.

      10:00 PM - 1 May 2019
      • 2 Likes
      • will minshew mrgunn
      0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info