That's fair, but sounds a little bit like a strawman to me, because I thought the belief that science produces absolute certainty to be rare, at least among scientists. Also, for what scientific endeavor is social constructivism useful?
-
-
-
Lynch’s book lays out the ethnomethodological approach to understanding science, which rejects the “social constructionist” view of e.g. Latour. He argues that Latour just did sign flips in logical positivism while retaining the conceptual framework, which was wrong.
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Considering this and the other recent posts of yours that I've seen, you might be interested in some of
@yungneocon 's threads https://twitter.com/yungneocon/status/1060308765562597377?s=20 … https://twitter.com/yungneocon/status/1092676364677861377 … https://twitter.com/yungneocon/status/1026264705302708224?s=20 … (a bunch of links and sources in this one) -
He has sociology of knowledge as a main interest and studies the modern meaning and existence of science/proliferation of variants of knowledge
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
people who rock ideology don't have a clue what to do with a methodology, its a quanta boundary out of reach.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.