I say “pretty much” only because “supernatural” is another vague word. If you start asking hard questions about what exactly it means, it starts to disintegrate.
Hmm… I think I’ve lost the thread of the conversation. Falsificationism is another whole kettle of fish. Generally, philosophers of science agree that it’s an unworkable theory. There’s a large literature on that; I can suggest things to read if it would be useful.
-
-
I don’t mean ‘falsificationism’, sorry. I just mean having a theory be falsifiable, as in, you can design a test that disproves it. You can’t design a test that disproves the existence of a soul.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.