Looking for opinion pieces of form "What light does X shed on software engineering research?", where X is:
1. psychology's replication crisis
2. that different sciences have different norms of explanation [1]
3. ethnomethodology [2]
cc// @hillelogram @gvwilson
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @context_ing @rfinz and
Not 100% relevant to all values of X but I just published a piece with
@HeathClaude@SophieSkach@Pat_Healey@tobyspark and Madeline Miller on drawing, transcription and the limitations of current graphical/software tools that might be useful: https://tidsskrift.dk/socialinteraction/article/view/113145 …1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @saul @context_ing and
This paper with
@JPdeRuiter might also be useful for two or more values of X https://www.collabra.org/articles/10.1525/collabra.132/ … - but not specifically relevant for software engineering research, more to the discontinuities between assumptions underlying software engineering in general.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @saul @context_ing and
For a take on some classic
#EMCA bugbears with computation - and something closer to an opinion piece though - see Hirst, G. (1991). Does conversation analysis have a role in computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics , 17 (2), 211–228. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/J91-2004 …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @saul @context_ing and
We're working now on a more important question: does Computational Linguistics have a role in Conversation Analysis? :-)
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
I did a paper on the converse question (as part of a discussion with Graham Button): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255674096_Computer_rules_conversational_rules … I intended to follow up with an implementation and a better paper, but ran out of time
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.