That point is well-taken, thank you! OTOH, “this is a silly religion” is a widespread assessment of LW rationalism, and I’d like to see that community take it more seriously instead of rejecting it unthinkingly.
If there actually isn’t such a theorem I’d be tempted to try to prove one :(
-
-
Coincidentally, Google Scholar decided to ping me with a link to this paper just this morning: https://www.gwern.net/docs/rl/2017-leike.pdf … . I only read the abstract but looks relevant.
-
Geez, my master’s thesis paper was the first publication in this area (computational complexity of planning); I guess it’s nice to see people are still doing it!pic.twitter.com/A98bgnNq7x
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
