It appears that more than half of all scientific papers are wrong. It would be helpful to have a database that said which those were. Yes that would be difficult. Not nearly as difficult as everyone having to find out the hard way, or not at all.https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1104957375134515200 …
-
-
The problem comes with treating retraction as a serious consequence for moral transgression rather than a corrective mechanism for work that is demonstrably flawed for any reason. Retraction statistics are heavily driven by large multi-journal bundles of papers from ...
-
... researchers who were found guilty of misconduct. I mean, there's about 500 a year or something, but the Fujii retraction was ~180 papers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.