It appears that more than half of all scientific papers are wrong. It would be helpful to have a database that said which those were. Yes that would be difficult. Not nearly as difficult as everyone having to find out the hard way, or not at all.https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1104957375134515200 …
-
-
I have done a good bit of work in that area https://osf.io/e81xl/wiki/home/ … The short answer is that there currently is no way to track failure to replicate without following the various reproducibility projects.
-
It might be possible, once there are a sufficient number of replication studies, to attempt to develop a model of replication likelihood, but we're not there yet.
@METRICStanford is a research group to watch.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.