Second, Scott very densely attributes mental actions to the program. He's an excellent writer, and if he didn't intend those to be literal, he would anticipate that some readers would take them as literal, and explicitly forestall that misunderstanding.
-
-
Well, at least I *tried* to back off a bit and look at the underlying reason of the disagreement to see if we could stop talking past each other and make the conversation more constructive. But you seem to be stuck in tribal name-calling mode so I guess I'll just call it a night.
-
Well... I'm pointing out that you are making substantive claims that hardly anyone outside your tribe finds plausible. That doesn't mean they are wrong, but it does mean they need stronger support than "I use the word that way."
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.