Feels analogous to Gödel’s Incompleteness. Do I understand you correctly?
-
-
-
There’s an analogy, but it’s probably mostly misleading. Gödel’s theorems concern the internal behavior of formal systems. The point here has to do with the relationship between formal systems and the real world.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is this the same as Popper saying that scientific method is NOT a method for producing scientific discovery but rather a method of criticizing ideas? Therefore Rationality as a whole is just a method for criticizing beliefs.
-
Not the same, although there’s a vague connection. The OP concerns Kuhn’s understanding, which came later than Popper’s, and which is usually taken as refuting Popper.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I read this today and thought of your tweet: http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/chang/7ullmann-margalit_big%20decisions_2006.pdf …
-
Thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This oddly reminds me of lesswrong post about maps of rationality, maps are not always the same with unstable world.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
worse than that in practice, the anti-frequentist kinds of Bayesianism aren't even that good relative to given data and hypotheses.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the rabbit hole of all rabbit holes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
