feedback for ingroup/metarational twitter: imho UST/ingroup is biased in the direction of rationality/current scientific orthodoxy (despite attempting to transcend/include rationality) and overly averse to the value of 'the ineffable' / learning via direct experience thoughts?https://twitter.com/_jordan_bates/status/924124150939099137 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @_jordan_bates
sounds like as a remote viewer you are conflating rats with posts, or maybe hyperfocusing on the lingering peripheral nrx leaners
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Tipsycaek
could be! if any iconic earnest postrat discussions of mysticism/esotericism/'the ineffable' come to mind plz link them as i'd love to see what i've been missing for the last several years : P
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_jordan_bates @Tipsycaek
“Valentine” on LW has been writing quite a lot about mystical stuff. He doesn’t identify as post or meta but is kinda there. Some others have joined in it too, eg
@xuenay . I don’t necessarily agree with everything they write but worth checking out!1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @_jordan_bates and
Huh. Actually, Valentine seems to have vanished as of 7 months ago. Hope he’s ok and is pursuing other more exciting projects! https://www.lesswrong.com/users/valentine
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Valentine's busy but fine, just chatted with him yesterday. :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Glad to hear, thank you for letting me know!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.