feedback for ingroup/metarational twitter: imho UST/ingroup is biased in the direction of rationality/current scientific orthodoxy (despite attempting to transcend/include rationality) and overly averse to the value of 'the ineffable' / learning via direct experience thoughts?https://twitter.com/_jordan_bates/status/924124150939099137 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @_jordan_bates
sounds like as a remote viewer you are conflating rats with posts, or maybe hyperfocusing on the lingering peripheral nrx leaners
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Tipsycaek
could be! if any iconic earnest postrat discussions of mysticism/esotericism/'the ineffable' come to mind plz link them as i'd love to see what i've been missing for the last several years : P
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_jordan_bates @Tipsycaek
https://buddhism-for-vampires.com/ https://approachingaro.org/ https://vividness.live/ and pretty much permeating everything
@meaningness has written, man. You can't do this work without a deep background in technical rationality _and_ esotericism.2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
I would go further and say that you can't do this work without being mildly bored and irritated by technical rationality and esotericism. Particularly the latter, which is mostly extremely bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Irritation is the essence of the path! (Somewhat seriously: it’s frequently stated in the tantras that mental clarity is the same energy as anger, when directed as conceptual confusion.)
4 replies 3 retweets 14 likes -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
If you wanted to pursue the specifically tantric angle on this, the relevant book would be: https://amzn.to/2SISfyA
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.