Rationalism tends to lump all phenomena other than formal rationality as a single deficient category. “Dual process” theories systematize this error.pic.twitter.com/mCafGrQbpz
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The System 1 vs. System 2 theory is invoked to explain certain findings. I realize there are alternative explanations (theories) available and was curious which was preferred.
Like what, specifically though. The problem is not using the theory in some narrow specific study (e.g. loss aversion is more like thinking "fast" than "slow") but that in assuming that the general dualism is of any general value beyond the old intuitive folk-psychological ones.
Will second this. But in general, Kahneman's positing a broad dualism comprised entirely of folk-psychological constructs (and which largely contradicts much phenomenological experience and actual data, see e.g. Gigerenzer) is more harmful than no theory at all here.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.