An important practical problem plus an attractive technical formulation generate an exciting research discipline, with funding, journals, conferences, and the appearance of interesting incremental results. Usually this is all wasted because fundamental assumptions are false.
-
Show this thread
-
David Chapman Retweeted David Chapman
The foundational asumptions of most research fields are forgotten as soon as possible, because they are inconveniently wrong. This is one major reason science has become so unproductive, I think. I’ve had to relearn this lesson repeatedly myself:https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1072210402094641152 …
David Chapman added,
1 reply 11 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
I spent three years working in structure-based drug discovery before I understood that its fundamental assumption, that intermolecular force fields derived from in vacuuo small-molecule measurements can predict large-molecule interactions in water, was utterly wrong.
4 replies 8 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
Digging into this, I was probably briefly the world expert in understanding solvent effects in predicting intermolecular binding affinity, which was saying very little indeed. I only realized that I knew almost nothing, whereas most other people in the field somehow didn’t.
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likesShow this thread -
Major opportunity for science culture reform: insist that the foundational assumptions of each field be made explicit and tested, instead of glossed over. Many-to-most fields will have to just start over when this happens. Some branches of psychology are doing this now—hooray!
3 replies 8 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
We should teach the skills for locating the hidden foundational assumptions of a field. Often these were explicit originally, then buried under various rhetorical devices that direct attention away. On the origins and obscuration of AI’s assumptions: https://www.gridspinoza.net/sites/default/files/2016-07/Toward%20a%20Critical%20Technical%20Practice%3A%20Lessons%20Learned%20in%20Trying%20to%20Reform%20AI%20Philip%20E.%20Agre.pdf …
2 replies 12 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Meaningness
Are you aware of the Bourbaki group’s attempt to systematise all of mathematics starting in the early 20th century?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Thanks, yes… that was a response to a foundational crisis (paradoxes of infinite sets) of this sort; good example!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.