So, @Meaningness has been posting recently on the general theme that (to heavily abbreviate...) "virtue signalling" should not be condemned because it may not be separable from virtue itself. I even participated with a comment intended to say virtue signalling may be inevitable.
-
-
I suspect what is most annoying is not the dishonesty, though, but the smugness and the appearance of confidence of moral superiority. I suspect that usually actually hides panic that one will be perceived as insufficiently moral and/or confident by one’s in-group.
-
One of my pet theories is that one mechanism to increase the odds of a "dishonest" signal to be accepted is for the signaler to vehemently believe what they are saying and to be non-introspective to their behavior/signal inconsistencies.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.