What are best existing secular explanations of Buddhist three characteristics / which assumptions your brain learns are untrue when you do insight meditation? Writing something and want to see what's already been done. @Meaningness @misen__ @Failed_Buddhist @joogipupu @_awbery_
-
-
No claim (e.g. about “the self”) can be credible in isolation, either. One has to explain its role in a conceptual context, and the limitations of that context.
-
There’s no possibility of nailing down a transcendent Truth of No-Self outside a conceptual framework… which is precisely what modernist interpreters of the anatta doctrine try to make it do.
#FAIL - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Working off your STEM pieces, wouldn't your ideal Buddhism have good things for Levels 3, 4, and 5, with encouragement to move up and clear paths to do it?
-
Yes, I think so! I wrote about that here:https://vividness.live/2015/10/16/better-buddhisms-a-developmental-approach/ …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.