When reading research output, ask first what game the author has skin in.https://twitter.com/JohnDCook/status/1058408141296226305 …
I’m not sure it applies there; I don’t know the field. @JohnDCook’s example was applied math that can’t be applied.
More generally though, most academics have reputational skin in a game, more than financial. If the game they are playing is irrelevant then you can ignore them.
-
-
I was reading about a problem people pay me to solve, and I got the distinct impression that the author had never talked to a client and was working on his paper count.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.