20th century “Buddhism” was largely based on Theosophy—a 19th century European pop-spiritual movement.
A major muddler was Edward Conze, whose history @Jayarava reveals here. Important for anyone who thinks they understand Prajñaparamita—or should.
http://jayarava.blogspot.com/2018/09/edward-conze-study-in-contradiction.html …
-
-
Buddhism, like Troy, is a city of ruins: countless layers of rebuilding on top of doctrines and practices that served their time and place, became obsolete, and were mainly ground underfoot, but whose most durable remnants poke through later constructions.
Show this thread -
Reinterpreting “Buddhism” as something completely different is utterly authentic. Leaders have insisted that their brand-new religion is “the original Word Of The Buddha” for at least 2000 years. A genuinely modern Buddhism shouldn’t need to lie about this any longer, though.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
interesting stuff, David. Slight tangent: you refer to 'late tantric reinterpretations', do you have a specific commentator/s in mind, or more a general style of interpretation from a period of time?
-
My personal preference is for the Dzogchen reworking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.