Uh, didn’t understand the question, because both categories are “most vocal”? I agree Kaj, Malcolm, and Valentine all transcend rationalism. I think Scott often does too, but he has some sort of stubborn allegiance to it that also often leads to (what seems to me) confusion.
-
-
Several have recently said that “rationalism” was a bad choice of label and they wish they could change it.
-
Scott can’t transcend rationalism because anything he writes becomes rationalism. The movement is secondary to the man
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.