I’m spending weeks reading many subfields in analytic philosophy, defensively. All comprehensively nonsense which I’m not going to discuss, but they do treat the phenomena I’m writing about, so I feel I have to be sure I’m not missing anything important.https://twitter.com/PaperFury/status/1027666554677166080 …
-
-
In order: 1. Taylor. Close to your subject. First pages review to you, goes deeper around moral ideal / self-responsibility—great clarity re: what you're fighting against. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/taylor.htm … (Also see "language animal" c6 and "theories of Meaning" from"phil papers 1")
-
2. Velleman. You'll note the idea applies to non-practical reason as well: https://thewinnower.com/papers/3846-epistemic-freedom … (Also, if you can get through the jargon part at the beginning, and overlook his use of the word "proposition", this is a good index and has some nice ideas https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/maize/13240734.0001.001/1:11/--possibility-of-practical-reason-2nd-edition?rgn=div1;view=fulltext …)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.