I’m spending weeks reading many subfields in analytic philosophy, defensively. All comprehensively nonsense which I’m not going to discuss, but they do treat the phenomena I’m writing about, so I feel I have to be sure I’m not missing anything important.https://twitter.com/PaperFury/status/1027666554677166080 …
Today, Elizabeth Barnes on ontic vagueness https://elizabethbarnesphilosophy.weebly.com/papers.html
-
-
Ah OK. I try these. Thanks!
-
I don’t recommend them! She thinks and writes unusually clearly, but the framework is so wrong that there’s no solutions to the problems as stated.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.